Pohjoisen

I went to see Ilves-Kärpät on Tuesday, a game that saw Ilves win 3-0 and ensure Raimo Helminen would get at least one more game at Hakametsä. I was in the company of Kärpät fans, so we shall view the game from their perspective. Incidentally, I have been to three playoff games now, and each time my team has lost. I may stay away if Jyp take things to a decider.

Before the game the Kärpät fans unveiled a banner that read ‘teille on Raipe, meille on poikka’-you’ve got Raipe, but we’ve got ‘the boy’, the latter being the nickname for SM-liiga’s outsized trophy. Both claims looked a bit dodgy, as Raipe played very little and Kärpät did not look like champions in the making.

It was my first Kärpät game, but not the best example of their dominance of SM Liiga. They are clearly a good team, some of their passing was mesmerising, but when it’s not going right it’s not going right. I was surprised to learn that they go everywhere by coach, even during the playoffs, and those 7 hour journeys must take their toll.

Pesonen riled a few Ilves players and most of the Ilves fans, but didn’t do much of note otherwise. Tero Leinonen had a great game in the Ilves net, at one point trying to head a shot clear even though it was flying high and wide.

I was also surprised by how many supporters Kärpät had, and pretty stunned to discover the geographical range of their fanbase. My friend’s father in law had come down for the game, getting the night train home afterwards. Only he hadn’t come from Oulu. Oh no. He had left his home the previous night, driving the 80km from Kangosjärvi to Kolari, caught the overnight train to Tampere, and spent the day with his daughter before the big game.

He lives 400km north of Oulu, in the Meänkieli heartlands along the banks of the River Torne. He explained that he finds it difficult in both Finland and Sweden, as it is not just the language but more of a cultural difference. His daughter described her birthplace as ‘the armpit of Finland’, but I think she was describing the shape of the map rather than making a qualitative judgement.

This is apparently very common in the north. Kärpät are the best supported team throughout Finnish lapland, and this has a lot to do with their financial muscle. Most of the fans who were in Tampere live in the economically dominant south west, but have their roots up north. Supporting Kärpät in away games is a connection they’re not keen to lose.

Kärpät won yesterday, and provided Raipe’s boys get a win at Hakametsä tomorrow the game will go to a decider on Saturday at Raksila. Jyp host Tappara tomorrow on TV, and I think I’ll watch it that way rather than going to lend my support. Three games, three losses and only one goal for ‘my’ teams does not bode well for clubs I support in person.

3 Responses to “Pohjoisen”

  1. CubanPuckstopper Says:

    http://forums.internationalhockey.net/showthread.php?t=5783

    In the thread linked above, post #101 makes reference to Kärpät applying for the KHL (i.e. Russian Open Super League), Is there any truth to that statement?

    Same for Salzburg from Austria, another team with decent $$$$.

    This has the potential to strip other countries leagues of their flagship teams.

  2. Egan Says:

    It is regarded as much more likely that Jokerit will play there, as their owner has made much more disparaging comments about the standard of Finnish hockey. I would question the benefit of Kärpät or Jokerit playing a full season agains HC Gazprom and Rusneft Eagles, as their budget would be at the bottom of the scale and they might not be able to compete. But if they were the only Finnish team involved they could probably bring ‘home’ a lot of guys for lower wages than they’d consider accepting to play in Russia.

    I think cross border clubs are fairly common in Europe, especially in Austria/Romania/Hungary. Obviously any club called ‘red bull’ are an abomination and I wish them ill, but I’m not sure this is a terrible thing. It would be preferable for the IIHF’s Champions League to develop better, as that would give more of a chance to the non-Russian sides to compete in one-off tournament games. I can’t see Jokerit getting a bigger crowd for a Thursday night game against Lokomotiv Yaroslavl than they would for a derby with HIFK.

  3. muukalainen Says:

    I don’t believe for a second that we (= Kärpät) applied to join the KHL. “Politely enquiring about” just to check what’s going on is one thing, applying is quite something else. Same goes for Jokerit. The risks for any Finnish club contemplating joining such a league full time are so fantastic as to be suicidal, for the reasons given in post 97 in the thread you link to. The potential erosion of the fan base, and the money that goes with it, is just too great. Having said that, Kärpät may be more resilient in this respect (at least until K-Laser become a force… ;) simply through the geography. When this subject arises I draw parallels with European football which, despite its vast wealth and repeated talk on the matter, still hasn’t taken such a step.

    However, and like Egan, I believe that international club competition in Europe can become successful by the consolidation and expansion of the IIHF’s Champions League. This builds international competition in addition to domestic competition, not as a replacement for it.

Leave a Reply